Speed Camera Van Blocked by a Tree Trunk!

Dear All,

A newsletter to warm the heart today…

An unknown person — possibly a local farmer(?) — has left a huge tree trunk in the location where a speed camera van regularly parks in Cheltenham:

I love stories like this…

It shows there are still people in this country who fight back against the (so called) Police extorting innocent Drivers going about their daily business.

A Mobile speed camera van perched up on this private land 25 times last year, ‘catching’ a staggering 291 Motorists out.

Police have asked the owner of the land to move the trunk.

I hope they have a strong enough backbone to simply ignore them, or even better just say no…

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on this “civil disobedience” in the comments below:

All the best,

Adam

Member Quick Links:

1) DriveProtect Membership Discount: Get BTST Member Discount here

2) Fuel Discount Card: Get Your Card here

3) BTST Bitcoin Fund: Download the Prospectus

4) Racing Trackdays: Motorsport Trackdays 2023

42 comments on “Speed Camera Van Blocked by a Tree Trunk!”

  1. I remember when the POLICE were respected and were there to help us, Now we are there to be bullied by the POLICE. Whatever country USA, CHINA, RUSSIA or UK they are not there to help us just to protect the ESTABLISHMENT.

    Reply
  2. Depends if the landowner owns the verge.
    The average sized tree trunk could be a danger to road users.
    Those found to be exceeding the speed limit are not “ Innocent “
    Police do not gain financially from the fines.

    Reply
    • they do from the driver awareness courses.
      these days there’s no disgression and I got nicked doing 43 in a 40 so they’re just weapons of mass cask extraction end of

      Reply
  3. Good on the farmer…the police farce have no right to park on his land and surely it’s illegal to block the access gates to his land which looks like they are used quite frequently.
    This is an example of the police exceeding their authority, and what cheek to ask the farmer to remove the tree.

    Reply
  4. looks like it’s the entrance to the farmers field and presumably not part of the highway, and privately owned. I wouldn’t have thought the police would have any right or legal grounds to request its removal?

    I think the good Samaritan could brighten up the lane by replacing the log with a reclaimed giant ghetto planter, that councils are using to restrict movement in the 15 minute cities.
    Much better use for one of those.

    Reply
  5. I’d put a strictly no parking notice on the gate along with a clamping notice and then the next time they park there he should clamp their van!

    Reply
  6. Well done to the farmer.

    There is one by the A1 by the Metro centre, Gateshead, they got there own spot write byside the flyover (be very careful you can only do 50).

    Reply
  7. If the land owner’s boundary includes that small area of land, then the cops are breaking a law by parking on it. The owner can put what he likes there if indeed the land is his. How about a home-made ‘stinger’? That’ll stop the bastards parking there

    Reply
  8. Just been reading a story of a pensioner who was out on the road with his shiny new BMW at 120 mph he suddenly saw a police car behind so he floored it to 130…140…150 then thought ‘I’m too old for this’ so he slowed to a stop and waited for the cop car to catch up. As the cop pulled in behind he got out of his car and walked over to the BMW. He told the pensioner “My shift finishes in 10 minutes. If you can give me one good reason that I haven’t heard before why you were speeding, I’ll let you go. The pensioner looked at him and replied. “Well a year ago my wife ran off with a policeman. I thought you were bringing her back. The cop gave a wry smile and said as he turned and walked back to his car “Enjoy the rest of your day sir!”

    Reply
  9. Just been reading a story of a pensioner who was out on the road with his shiny new BMW at 120 mph he suddenly saw a police car behind so he floored it to 130…140…150 then thought ‘I’m too old for this’ so he slowed to a stop and waited for the cop car to catch up. As the cop pulled in behind he got out of his car and walked over to the BMW. He told the pensioner “My shift finishes in 10 minutes. If you can give me one good reason that I haven’t heard before why you were speeding, I’ll let you go. The pensioner looked at him and replied. “Well a year ago my wife ran off with a policeman. I thought you were bringing her back. The cop gave a wry smile and said as he turned and walked back to his car “Enjoy the rest of your day sir!”

    Reply
  10. No-one seems to know who put the tree there, the Police have only guessed it was the Farmer. Therefore he should inform them it’s not his tree and would they arrange it’s removal without any cost to him. It appears to me that one of the ‘ensnared’ victims did the job ?

    Reply
  11. I was under the impression that the Police had to have permission to park their speed vans, I was told that Surrey County Council give them permission to park on grass verges. If I was the farmer I would charge them at least £1000 every time they park there.

    Reply
  12. Surely if those gates lead on to HIS/HER land, and they park one of their ‘revenue raising’ vans there, then they are blocking his/her access. Cant’ be legal, can it?

    Reply
  13. If the police promise to stop all fly-tipping in field entrances like this, and to persuade any caravan owners who bring their vehicles through these and other gates like them, then, and only then, might I consider their request to the farmer reasonable (if, indeed, he did put the tree there).
    As a matter of interest, if speeding tickets were issued from a van parked illegally, are those fines valid..?

    Reply
  14. I suppose the tree could have been left at the gate to deter caravan dwellers or fly tippers? Anyway, was the van parking with the landowner’s permission? As for asking the landowner to move it, personally I’d say to plod – not mine guv’nor – but you can shift it if you wish. Of course, it would be possible to churn the gate area to make it impassably muddy, alternatively the landowner could charge rent, say 10% of all takings?

    Reply
  15. Ay first sight – great !

    However, there is a downside to this – the locals/regular users of this road will be aware & not get caught.
    Now, the scamera van will find a new place & more people will get caught.

    Reply
  16. If it’s on private land and it’s not a hazard or causing an obstruction, then the farmer should not be legally obliged to move it. Van could find somewhere else to park.

    Reply

Leave a Comment